| SOFTBALL TIPS |
|
|
|
| SITE STUFF |
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES
|
| • |
June 26, 2005 |
| • |
July 03, 2005 |
| • |
July 10, 2005 |
| • |
July 17, 2005 |
| • |
July 24, 2005 |
| • |
July 31, 2005 |
| • |
August 07, 2005 |
| • |
August 14, 2005 |
| • |
August 21, 2005 |
| • |
August 28, 2005 |
| • |
September 11, 2005 |
| • |
October 02, 2005 |
| • |
October 09, 2005 |
| • |
October 23, 2005 |
| • |
October 30, 2005 |
| • |
November 06, 2005 |
| • |
November 13, 2005 |
| • |
December 04, 2005 |
| • |
December 18, 2005 |
| • |
December 25, 2005 |
| • |
January 08, 2006 |
| • |
January 15, 2006 |
| • |
January 29, 2006 |
| • |
February 05, 2006 |
| • |
February 12, 2006 |
| • |
February 19, 2006 |
| • |
February 26, 2006 |
| • |
March 05, 2006 |
| • |
March 12, 2006 |
| • |
March 19, 2006 |
| • |
March 26, 2006 |
| • |
April 02, 2006 |
| • |
April 09, 2006 |
| • |
April 16, 2006 |
| • |
April 23, 2006 |
| • |
April 30, 2006 |
| • |
May 07, 2006 |
| • |
May 14, 2006 |
| • |
May 21, 2006 |
| • |
May 28, 2006 |
| • |
June 04, 2006 |
| • |
June 11, 2006 |
| • |
June 18, 2006 |
| • |
June 25, 2006 |
| • |
July 09, 2006 |
| • |
July 16, 2006 |
| • |
July 23, 2006 |
| • |
July 30, 2006 |
| • |
August 13, 2006 |
| • |
August 20, 2006 |
| • |
September 03, 2006 |
| • |
September 10, 2006 |
| • |
September 17, 2006 |
| • |
September 24, 2006 |
| • |
October 01, 2006 |
| • |
October 08, 2006 |
| • |
October 15, 2006 |
| • |
October 22, 2006 |
| • |
November 12, 2006 |
| • |
November 26, 2006 |
| • |
December 31, 2006 |
| • |
January 14, 2007 |
| • |
January 21, 2007 |
| • |
January 28, 2007 |
| • |
February 04, 2007 |
| • |
February 11, 2007 |
| • |
February 18, 2007 |
| • |
February 25, 2007 |
| • |
March 04, 2007 |
| • |
March 11, 2007 |
| • |
March 18, 2007 |
| • |
April 01, 2007 |
| • |
April 08, 2007 |
| • |
April 15, 2007 |
| • |
April 22, 2007 |
| • |
April 29, 2007 |
| • |
May 06, 2007 |
| • |
May 13, 2007 |
| • |
May 20, 2007 |
| • |
May 27, 2007 |
| • |
June 03, 2007 |
| • |
June 10, 2007 |
| • |
June 17, 2007 |
| • |
June 24, 2007 |
| • |
July 01, 2007 |
| • |
July 22, 2007 |
| • |
July 29, 2007 |
| • |
August 12, 2007 |
| • |
August 19, 2007 |
| • |
September 02, 2007 |
| • |
September 16, 2007 |
| • |
September 30, 2007 |
| • |
October 07, 2007 |
| • |
October 14, 2007 |
| • |
October 21, 2007 |
| • |
November 04, 2007 |
| • |
November 18, 2007 |
| • |
November 25, 2007 |
| • |
December 02, 2007 |
| • |
December 09, 2007 |
| • |
December 16, 2007 |
| • |
January 13, 2008 |
| • |
February 17, 2008 |
| • |
February 24, 2008 |
| • |
March 02, 2008 |
| • |
March 09, 2008 |
| • |
March 30, 2008 |
| • |
April 06, 2008 |
| • |
April 13, 2008 |
| • |
April 20, 2008 |
| • |
April 27, 2008 |
| • |
May 04, 2008 |
| • |
May 11, 2008 |
| • |
May 18, 2008 |
| • |
May 25, 2008 |
| • |
June 01, 2008 |
| • |
June 15, 2008 |
| • |
June 22, 2008 |
| • |
June 29, 2008 |
| • |
July 06, 2008 |
| • |
July 13, 2008 |
| • |
July 20, 2008 |
| • |
August 03, 2008 |
| • |
August 10, 2008 |
| • |
August 17, 2008 |
| • |
August 24, 2008 |
| • |
August 31, 2008 |
| • |
September 07, 2008 |
| • |
September 14, 2008 |
| • |
September 21, 2008 |
| • |
September 28, 2008 |
| • |
October 05, 2008 |
| • |
October 12, 2008 |
| • |
October 19, 2008 |
| • |
October 26, 2008 |
| • |
November 02, 2008 |
| • |
November 09, 2008 |
| • |
November 16, 2008 |
| • |
November 30, 2008 |
| • |
December 07, 2008 |
| • |
December 21, 2008 |
| • |
December 28, 2008 |
| • |
February 15, 2009 |
| • |
February 22, 2009 |
| • |
April 12, 2009 |
| • |
April 19, 2009 |
| • |
April 26, 2009 |
| • |
May 03, 2009 |
| • |
May 10, 2009 |
| • |
May 17, 2009 |
| • |
May 24, 2009 |
| • |
May 31, 2009 |
| • |
June 07, 2009 |
| • |
June 14, 2009 |
| • |
June 21, 2009 |
| • |
July 05, 2009 |
| • |
July 12, 2009 |
| • |
July 19, 2009 |
| • |
August 02, 2009 |
| • |
August 30, 2009 |
| • |
September 06, 2009 |
| • |
September 20, 2009 |
| • |
October 04, 2009 |
| • |
October 11, 2009 |
| • |
October 18, 2009 |
| • |
November 08, 2009 |
| • |
November 15, 2009 |
| • |
November 22, 2009 |
| • |
November 29, 2009 |
| • |
December 27, 2009 |
| • |
January 03, 2010 |
| • |
January 10, 2010 |
| • |
January 17, 2010 |
| • |
January 24, 2010 |
| • |
January 31, 2010 |
| • |
March 14, 2010 |
| • |
March 21, 2010 |
| • |
March 28, 2010 |
|
|
| SOFTBALL LINKS |
|
|
|
Florida High Schools To Pitch From 43 Feet
by Dave
Thursday, August 25, 2005
According to the Naples Daily News (registration required), the Florida High School Athletic Association will move the softball pitcher's circle back to 43 feet for the 2006 season in the interest of increasing player (presumably pitcher) safety. Florida will be the first state to change the pitching distance to the college distance. This rule change will apply to all varsity and jv games.
I don't know exactly what to make of this change. I'm not convinced that just doing this can prevent a high percentage of injuries which occur to pitchers on balls hit back to the box. When I read this, I wanted to gain a better understanding of what this 3 feet will mean. So I did a little mathematical exercise I will share with you.
First off, you need to have a starting point for hit ball speed. I always thought a hit ball was about twice as fast as a pitched ball but I am unable to find anything even close to that online. I did see that, at least with respect to baseball, the NCAA restricts the speed of a hit ball. This manifests itself in testing of bats which can be certified for use. I honestly do not know if the NCAA does the same for softball but I'll assume they do. I'll also assume high schools follow whatever the NCAA does. I saw some baseball bat studies which indicate a speed of around 100 mph is probably close to reality. That equates to around 111% of the pitched speed. Given that good high school softball pitchers throw anywhere from 58 - 66, I used a batted ball speed of 70 mph. This may not be 100% accurate but this is what I used.
70 mph converts to 77 feet per second. At 40 feet, that means the pitcher has .519 seconds in which to react to a batted ball. At 43 feet, the time is .558 seconds. The difference is .04 seconds. That is not a lot of additional time. The only way I can think of to get a sense the length of time .04 seconds takes, is to watch a digital clock or use a stop watch. I don;t have a stopwatch handy and the only digital clock I have handy reads out seconds. If you watch a one second readout and see how long one second is, consider that within that one second, there were 25 periods of time equal to the additional time a pitcher will have to react when the pitcher's plate is moved back 3 feet.
So if going back to 43 feet doesn't do it, what else can we consider? I suppose we could require that bats hit balls at no greater speed than say 50 or 60 mph. Every 10 mph reduction would add about another tenth of a second to the reaction time. That's a considerable improvement. But on the other hand, we really do not want women's softball to be reduced to some gentile sport where women can wear frilly dresses and big sun bonnets like some sort of throw back to the roaring twenties. Fastpitch softball is a tough game where players can get hurt just as baseball is a tough game where players can get hurt. It is an exciting game mostly because it is so very fast.
I don't want to sound as if I am taking a "who cares" attitude about players. I have a couple daughters who are in the line of fire or, if you will, the circle of fire. But I wonder what exactly the right thing to do is without hurting the sport. The original move to 43 feet was to provide greater reaction time to batters in order to remove the overwhelming percentage of strike outs which were ruining the game as pitchers became faster and faster. I think that was the right move. The game needed more hitting. But it also need greater safety, not because it is girls playing it but because the dangers are a little over the top.
I watched my 10 year old daughter nearly break a pitcher's shoulder with a simple line drive. When I told her coach about this, he told me a story of how his daughter at the age of 15 broke a pitcher's jaw. There just should not be so many readily available instances of such injuries to pitchers such that everyone knows one off the top of their head. Anecdotally speaking, there just must be too much danger.
But if the pitching distance and bats alone cannot do the job without wrecking the game, I think the best alternative is to change the protective gear which pitchers wear. We put helmets on even professional hockey players. We require catchers to wear face masks and helmets. We even make the batter wear a helmet and, more and more frequently, those helmets come with a face mask. It seems a simple, logical step to adjust pitcher's protective gear in order to improve their safety.
Perhaps the equipment currently available is not up to the job. There are fielder's face masks and other devices out there. But at least partly because there has not been a call from the softball "industry," there is currently not a huge selection of protective pitching gear. If the highest level of the sport would conduct studies and work with the manufacturers, we might have a workable solution which would become the norm as the highest levels would model such gear for us. It would be a trivial matter to convince a girl to wear what Jennie Finch is wearing on TV! I think that's the best answer to this very real problem.
In conclusion, I applaud Florida for at least trying to address the safety concerns for pitchers. I don't think it does the complete job, however. I suspect the way to address this is via newly developed equipment. I sincerely hope the softball establishment partners with industry to develop protective gear for pitchers and then champions it in a manner which will make every girl want to wear it.
 
|
|
|
